Free Updates
Navigation
Categories
| November, 2009 (1) |
| October, 2009 (2) |
| September, 2009 (2) |
| August, 2009 (2) |
| July, 2009 (3) |
| June, 2009 (2) |
| May, 2009 (2) |
| April, 2009 (2) |
| March, 2009 (8) |
| February, 2009 (7) |
| January, 2009 (6) |
| December, 2008 (2) |
| November, 2008 (2) |
| October, 2008 (2) |
| September, 2008 (3) |
| August, 2008 (1) |
| April, 2008 (1) |
| March, 2008 (1) |
Search
Archives
| | Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | | 29 | 30 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
More Links
|
 Thursday, April 23, 2009
Good and old, or just old?
Posted by John
Greetings,
I am just back from the Battlefield Show in St. Paul, Minnesota. Bob Johnson puts on a great show. I was impressed by how high the attendance was. Table sales may have been a bit lower than usual, but there was no shortage of potential buyers walking around. Bob does a great job of promoting the show which was held concurrently with a gun show and a flea market elsewhere on the State Fairgrounds.
Two things at the Battlefield Show reminded me that I am not the young kid on the block anymore. First, I realized that I had been going to Bob’s shows since I was 17 years old. That was nearly 30 years ago! Back then, Bob had a partner and a small shop in Minneapolis. Funny thing, he looks about the same as he did back then! I wish I could say the same.
The second reminder of the passing of time was a comment I heard from three different people when describing relics that they had recently purchased. Each one used the expression, “And it’s been in a private collection for 25 years!” The implication was that it must be real because it has been locked away for a quarter of a century.
The first couple of times I heard the expression, it didn’t really register. I simply accepted it in the manner in which it was offered: evidence of authenticity. However, lying in my motel after hearing it a third time, I did the math. 25 years means that the items entered the sellers’ collections in 1984—the same exact year I sat in my grad school-provided apartment, rubbing bogus Third Reich decals off of supposed “transitional helmets”.
Over the preceding couple of years, I had bought a number of helmets from a collector who “had them since soon after the end of WWII” (another 25 years!). I bought the “transitional” single decal M16 helmets from him for about $125-$155 a piece. And, as the flaking decals revealed, they were as fake as fingernails on a frog.
After rubbing the decals off, I was left with several nice WWI M16 helmets (then worth about $55-$75 a piece). It was a hard lesson, but it taught me that time in a collection does not establish believable provenance for items. When I was young, “25 years ago” equaled “right after WWII". Today, that same 25 years equals 1984—a peak in counterfeiting history.
Like other old timers, I have plenty of good stuff that has been in my collection for 25 years. Most likely, I some of it is bad. I want to suggest to collectors to take that old expression, “It’s been in my collection for nigh onto 25 years now…” with a grain of salt. It might be true. And there might well be a good reason the object hasn’t seen the light of day for a quarter of a century.
Be cautious and keep finding the good stuff,
John Adams-Graf
Editor, Military Trader and Military Vehicles Magazine
Thursday, April 23, 2009 10:31:15 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Friday, April 10, 2009
Fakes and phonies
Posted by John
Greetings, Fake and phony militaria is nothing new. Ever since soldiers began bringing home trophies, someone has been busy converting the items into rare and more valuable specimens. A couple of years ago, Military Trader asked readers what they would do with a medal in their collection if they discovered it was a fake. Only 10% of respondents admitted that they would sell the item on eBay or at a show: “buyer beware.” 29% said they would simply destroy the medal and avoid confusing (or tempting) future collectors. A surprising 61% of respondents said that they would “Permanently mark the medal indicating that it was a fake and keep it.” I say “surprisingly” because in 30+ years of collecting and visiting other collectors, I have never actually seen a medal that was marked that way. So, I put out a call for readers to submit examples of how they marked a known reproduction item so that future collectors would not be fooled. Advance Guard Militaria ( www.advanceguardmilitaria.com) recently shared some interesting examples with me. The first item, which owner Jeff Shrader admits fooled him to the tune of a few hundred dollars, is a gorgeous World War I Second Division shoulder patch. Upon close inspection, the painting is meticulous, the wool felt appears old and the entire package exhibits a bit of soiling typical of 90+ years of storage. However, when hit with a black light, the white stitching around the star glows like lip-gloss on a Mississippi River stripper. Beautiful, but 100% fake and quite obviously made to deceive. The detail on this WWI 2nd Division patch is meticulous—and FAKE! Marked “REPRODUCTION” with indelible ink, no one will ever pay “original price” for this fake again. By not destroying the fake, Shrader has a baseline piece to use when examining other questionable painted patches.Jeff noted that the simplest answer is to simply burn the patch. But then documentation of the forger’s style would be lost, giving him/her a clear path to perfect their production. Instead, Jeff has clearly marked the back with indelible ink and has taken meticulous, close-up photos that will eventually be available to his customers through his Web site. The next item he shared was a Third Reich Iron Cross, First Class. The dimensions were correct. It was a multiple-piece frame and cross. However, the core was not magnetic—a sure sign that it is a fake. Again, an indelible marker noted the forgery on the back, and Jeff took photos to serve as a comparative record.  Outwardly, this WWII Iron Cross looks perfect. The simple lack of pull on a magnet, though, revealed that it is a fake.
The reverse is marked with permanent marker changing the fake into a study piece.
In any large volume business, there are obviously a lot of items that pass through that simply just aren’t worth the time to document. Jeff devised a use for such pieces: He created a cement “Walk of Shame” in which he pressed the cheap forgeries to be entombed in a concrete mosaic for the ages. Advance Guard Militaria has a “Walk of Shame” into
which staff members press known fake pieces of
militaria into wet cement.
 WHAT ABOUT YOU? Have you permanently marked your fakes? I would really like to show examples in Military Trader. Send a high-resolution photo of your medals showing your marking methods to john.adams-graf@fwpubs.com. Proper credit will be noted (if so desired!) Keep ‘em rolling and keep finding the good stuff! John Adams-Graf Editor, Military Trader & Military Vehicles
Friday, April 10, 2009 2:28:26 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
|