Free Updates
Navigation
Categories
| August, 2010 (7) |
| July, 2010 (3) |
| June, 2010 (3) |
| May, 2010 (5) |
| April, 2010 (3) |
| March, 2010 (3) |
| February, 2010 (2) |
| January, 2010 (2) |
| December, 2009 (3) |
| November, 2009 (2) |
| October, 2009 (2) |
| September, 2009 (2) |
| August, 2009 (2) |
| July, 2009 (3) |
| June, 2009 (2) |
| May, 2009 (2) |
| April, 2009 (2) |
| March, 2009 (8) |
| February, 2009 (7) |
| January, 2009 (6) |
| December, 2008 (2) |
| November, 2008 (2) |
| October, 2008 (2) |
| September, 2008 (3) |
| August, 2008 (1) |
| April, 2008 (1) |
| March, 2008 (1) |
Search
Archives
| | Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|
| 29 | 30 | 31 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 1 | 2 | | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
More Links
|
 Wednesday, January 27, 2010
Where is your collection?
Posted by John
Greetings, Where is your collection? Over the past month, I have processed two very fine collections, neither of which has ever seen the light of day. While sorting through the uniforms, medals and headgear, I have given a lot of thought to what we do with items in our collection once we have captured the quarry.
The first collection that I poured over had been packed away in cardboard boxes in 1983. The owner thoughtfully wrapped each item in pages of Shotgun News. Box after box of uniforms and accouterments were stuffed full, with any gaps filled with crumpled pages of the once-formidable —but extremely acidic—collecting newspaper.
His storage method did nothing for the collection. Several pieces had to be thrown away because they were just too damaged by the acids in the newsprint. Additionally, the mice loved the taste of Shotgun News, and munching away in the dark, evidently could not discern the difference between wood pulp newsprint and red wool broadcloth of a British Victorian-era officer’s tunic.
Aside from a few bad choices in storage methods, I wondered about how much this collector enjoyed his collection. There obviously was satisfaction in obtaining the items because each item was carefully coded with a tag, but then it appears that once that was done, the item went into a box. This process continued for more than 30 years until the collector passed away and the family decided to reclaim the real estate occupied by the stacks of boxes.
The second collection came packed in plastic tubs. This was certainly a step-up from the previous cardboard-encased group! An added bonus was that the collector himself came with material to help to describe and prepare the items for sale. We had a great time digging it out, and seeing the vast array of material that this man had amassed over a 40-year period of very focused WWI-collecting.
Everyone involved in the process were struck by the scarcity of many of the pieces we uncovered. It was nothing but sheer joy describing, photographing and inventorying the items for subsequent sale. As a WWI collector myself, I had to wipe the drool from my lips many times and realize that my job was to process and not covet.
As much fun as we had sorting and handling the objects, I was struck by a statement the owner of the collection made before he left, “This is the first time in 40 years that I have seen the collection all at one time.” Like so many collectors, he had dreams of eventually having a building dedicated to displaying his collections. A former museum professional, he even entertained the notion of his own museum, or at least, a gallery in another museum that would display his wares.
But time caught up to him. He was astounded just how fast 40 years passed and he wasn’t much closer to his dream. Rather, he had a “collecting room” but it was filled, wall-to-ceiling, with these plastic tubs filled with his collection. He never had the space to open the tubs and perform a crucial step in organized collecting: Evaluation. Rather, he had to keep it all in his head. When he found a cartridge box or helmet, he had to determine, sight unseen, if it was an upgrade of something he already had. If it was, he went through the tubs searching for the item to bump from the collection to make room for the new acquisition. He never experienced the joy of walking into a space and being able to view his collection in its entirety.
WHAT DO YOU DO WITH YOUR COLLECTION?
We all collect this stuff for a variety of reasons, probably some we don’t readily understand. But this isn’t the place for a psychological examination of the roots of collecting. Anyone in this hobby does it because of an interest in military history.
My recent experiences unpacking the two collections, though, has really caused me to think about my own collecting. I have been through many phases in my collecting.
When I was young up through my college years, I collected German helmets. Each new one I found went on a shelf until the walls of my room were lined.
Then, I went through a phase of collecting Hitler Youth material. This seemed to be a Riker-mount and hanging closet kind of collection. It didn’t take up as much room as the helmets, but unless I sat down with it, the collection was impossible to view and evaluate in any easy way.
The Hitler Youth material yielded its place in my heart when I jumped into reenacting. That obsession led to my collecting area being filled with stacks of uniforms, equipment and weapons. No one could have untangled that mess! But, it was all stuffed in a closet so didn’t impose itself on my wife or daughter.
During the years when I was raising my daughter, collecting took a bit of a back seat. Toys displaced collecting spaces, and frankly, I enjoyed being with my daughter more than I enjoyed going to shows or being on the hunt. However, during those years, my photography collection continued to grow and grow with a focus on early daguerreotypes. Initially, these items were easy to display around our home: sneak one onto the knick-knack shelf, on top of the dresser, along the edge of the television. Pretty soon, our little duplex was awash with silver plates reflecting the images of 1840s people wherever one turned.
Like most collectors, I didn’t stop there. I started to fill drawers and acid-free boxes with still more daguerreotypes, ambrotypes, tintypes and carte de visites.
I tried to keep a running inventory but that didn’t provide the adrenaline rush of going from antique shop to flea market looking for the next capture. My enthusiasm didn’t go unnoticed. The Daguerreian Society, an international organization of photo-historians, collectors and practitioners elected me their president. I was in full-blown collector obsession mode.
Alas, like so many collectors, the obsession took over my life. Coupled with a series of similarly unwise decisions, I wound up in divorce court. The collection was liquidated along with the lifestyle. As I organized the collection for sale, I realized I hadn’t seen many of the pieces since the day I placed them in their appointed acid-free boxes. I didn’t say it out loud, but I did ask myself, “what was the point?” Needless to say, my collecting mojo was depleted.
But you can’t keep a good collector down. After a few years, I started gathering items related to the 10th Mountain Division experience in WWII. Soon my office was overflowing with mannequins, rucksacks, snowshoes and skis. The collection occupied two of the three bedrooms in my little house. I was able to spend hours amidst the collection studying, learning and absorbing. The learning curve was sharp and the enjoyment complete.
But, it hit a limit. At a certain point, I realized I wasn't getting any smarter by buying another pair of skis or another rucksack. Rather, I switched from “study” mode to “hoarding”. Remembering past experiences, I knew where this was leading…a collection packed in boxes.
So, using that as an excuse, I liquidated that collection and paid off long-standing credit card bills. I sold my house (just a coincidence, not a reaction to the collection!) and moved into a duplex. The master bedroom became my office. Simultaneously, I decided to focus my collecting efforts on a topic that had been long dear to my heart: The origin of the American Tank Corps during WWI.
This actually seems to be a good fit…the market isn’t flooded with items, so I am able to make very careful purchases. Limiting myself to identified items slows down my spending even more. And finally, each item is able to find a place of display in my office. So, through the course of the day, I am surrounded by the items that I enjoy collecting and researching. I am proud to say, there are fewer than ten tunics on hangers or in acid-free boxes. Rather than occupying the spaces permanently, they are part of my rotating display. About every six months, I strip the torsos and place a new uniform on so that I get to enjoy the full collection with out risking it to long-term exposure.
I still collect historic photographs, having focused my attention on WWI images over the last ten years. After I copystand each new image, the photos go into albums. But that isn’t to say I don’t enjoy the images. Apart from being able to drag an album onto the couch for a Sunday afternoon’s perusal, I have loaded low-res copies of each image onto my screensaver. I am embarrassed to think how much time I have just stopped what I am doing to watch a 25” wide-presentation of WWI soldiers in the middle of the day!
I don’t know if I have learned too many lessons over the years, but I continue to examine my own collecting habits and those of my peers. I am always curious to learn how people use their collections. Drop me a note and a picture or two of how you enjoy your collection and I can share those on the web site or in the magazine. You never know, it might just inspire someone to drag out their collection and learn to enjoy it all over again.
Keep finding the good stuff, John Adams-Graf Editor, Military Trader and Military Vehicles
Wednesday, January 27, 2010 9:36:04 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Thursday, January 14, 2010
My First War Movie
Posted by John
Greetings,
Growing
up in a home the youngest of four boys and a sister, I was lucky to get lots of
hand-me-down clothes, toys and attention. My brothers were all history
enthusiasts, probably the result of our monthly trips to the library or book
store where we were each allowed to select our own books. Of course, once home
and read, the books were passed around, so we all had similar interests. If one
brother was reading about the Battle of Gettysburg, by the next trip to the
library, all of the others shared in the interest.
This
supportive environment was subconsciously supported by my parents who were both
avid readers. My Dad, a WWII vet, was always reading some historic treatise,
and although he never really talked about the books he read, he always seemed
so smart when asked a question. I was always pestering him to teach me close
order drill, how to salute or the proper way to carry the musette bag and
pistol belt that he brought home from the war.
The
best night of the week was, of course, Saturday night (baths withstanding).
There was usually a movie on the television and the whole family would stake
out their claim in the living room and Dad would make popcorn.
Our
little town didn’t have a movie theater, but occasionally my dad would drop my
brothers off at a theater in neighboring La Crosse, Wisconsin, to attend a
matinee while he and I went to the library and book store. He didn’t say it,
but I was just too young to take to the movies.
However,
in 1969, my brothers planned on attending the new release of the “Battle of
Britain.” I heard them talking about it for a week so when the day of our La
Crosse trip came around, I begged my dad to let me go to the movies with the
boys. He relented and all of us…the four boys and my dad…took our places in the
dark theater, anticipating the rise of the curtain and the big screen dog
fights.
With
the first planes lifting off grass runways, I was right there in the movie with
the RAF pilots. I didn’t have a plane, but I had mastered mimicking the sound
of a Rolls Royce engine and chattering Vickers machine guns. As the battle on
screen intensified, so did my vocal participation in the combat. Sounding
somewhere between a screaming Donald Duck and wet firecrackers, I was oblivious
to the people who got up and sat elsewhere. With each Hurricane or Spitfire
that started to tunnel in, I accompanied with appropriate 7-year-old-produced
vocal renditions of sputtering engines, gasping pilots and exploding gas tanks.
It
was only in a lull of the combat did I notice that my dad and I were
alone…everyone—including my brothers—had moved as far from us as the theater
walls would permit.
Eventually
the agony of my brothers and my father were alleviated when the film finally
ended. I was exhausted from vocalized aerial combat. Nevertheless, I chattered
about the movie for the entire 30 minute ride back to our home. I thought the
movie was the greatest thing I had ever seen and I spent countless hours
recreating dog fights with pencil and paper. In fact, for years thereafter, I
was quick to exclaim “Battle of Britain” whenever someone asked me what was my
favorite movie.
Nearly
40 years passed when my brothers and I carried popcorn to our seats to see the
“Battle of Britain” when I noticed the DVD for sale at Wal-Mart. There was no
question that a movie that had made such an impact in my life had to be added
to my personal library. I purchased it, rushed home, and with a bucket of
chicken snuggled in my lap, I started the movie that I was sure would carry me
back to that matinee with my brothers and Dad.
The
movie started and I quickly devoured a few drumsticks and thigh before it
dawned on me….other than the original Henkels and ME109s used in the film, this
movie STUNK! It was painful to
watch, but I and the chicken persevered (though the latter surrendered early
before the Nazis’ second wave on London).
I
was truly disappointed. The movie didn’t stir me the way it had when I was
seven. It wasn’t “bigger than life”. It was the serious drama I thought it was.
Though the combat scenes were lively and there was plenty of cool air-to-air
action between Spitfires and MEs, it was no better than any of the hundreds of
other war movies I have watched in the ensuing 40 years. What had happened?
Then
it dawned on me… “Battle of Britain” wasn’t my favorite movie of all time
because of good acting or realistic depictions of combat, though to my
7-year-old mind, those were the obvious factors. Rather, it was my favorite
movie of all time because it packaged a wonderful memory of being the “baby
brother” who got to spend a day at the movies with his big brothers and his
dad.
Preserve the memories,
John A-G
Editor, Military Trader and Military Vehicles Magazine
Thursday, January 14, 2010 2:52:31 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
|